You see those trees with white flowers in the drone photo below from early spring 2020?
Those are pear trees growing in a southern Indiana plot where oak and pecan trees had been planted in previous years. As the owner of that land will attest, however, those pear trees were not planted as part of his reforestation project.
In fact, as best owner Jerrod Carlisle can tell, those pear trees likely spread from two “dwarf pear trees” included with a “postage stamp orchard” he had bought by mail several years ago.
That postage stamp orchard turned out to be a really bad deal for Jerrod. He soon found the dwarf pear trees produced no fruit any human could eat. Even worse, the pear trees spread into his forest. Only after the timber harvest and some research did Jerrod learn of the full scope of the problem he now faces.
Jerrod found out these were Callery pears (Pyrus calleryana). The story of the Callery pear and why it was brought the U.S. is a fascinating one. Originally, botanists collected its seeds in China to help buck up resistance of pear fruit trees in the U.S. to fire blight. However, John L. Creech, who headed the National Arboretum in Washington, D.C., saw the Callery pear’s potential as an ornamental, and that’s how a variety of this species gained its fame under the name, the “Bradford Pear.”
The Bradford pear arrived on the market in the 1960s with fanfare. According to January 5, 1964 edition of the New York Times: “Few trees possess every desired attribute, but the Bradford ornamental pear comes unusually to [sic] close to the ideal.”
But, why is this “ideal” ornamental trying to take over Jerrod’s forest? If you read that New York Times article, many of the attributes that made it a good ornamental back in the day also make it a formidable invader today.
- The Callery blooms early in spring, and its leaves stay green late in fall.
- The abundant fruit are eaten by birds and squirrels.
- It grows under a wide range of soil and climatic conditions.
- It resists disease and insects.
- Its deep taproots help it survive dry periods.
To tackle his Callery pear problem, Jerrod purchased our Large Foam Herbicide Dispenser Package in December 2019. He started doing cut stump treatments this past winter. As you can see from the area marked in red in the photo below, Jerrod has already made progress. There are no blooming pear trees on the part that he treated.
Jerrod has several goals with his work. He wants to ensure the property serves as good wildlife habitat. Jerrod is a hunter who enjoys spending time out in nature.
But if you talk with Jerrod, you quickly realize he also wants to raise awareness of the threat posed by the Callery pear. As Jerrod noted, Interstate 69 was recently renovated near his home. During construction, the right-of-way had miles of bare soil for extended periods of time. Now Callery pear blanket miles-long stretches of that major highway.
And, all the while, more Bradford pears are coming on the market. On March 30, 2021, I did a search online. Here’s what it produced:
A first step in saving uninvaded natural areas is not paying good money to plant this horrible tree. As Jerrod can attest, you will regret it if you buy it, but you will regret it even more if you plant it.
For further reading:
- Culley TM, The Rise and Fall of the Ornamental Callery Pear Tree, Arnoldia, 2017;74(3).
- Hurley KH, The Detested Bradford Pear Tree Is Coming to a Forest Near You, CityLab, July 2, 2019.
I attended a wonderful conference in Coeur d’ Alene, Idaho, put on by Steve Manning and his group at Invasive Plant Control from December 10-12, 2019. One theme: rodent eradication! Dickie Hall, Habitat Restoration Project Director, talked about the complete eradication of rats on the Island of South Georgia. The island is a treeless tundra not far from Antarctica. This is a huge win for many bird species that nest on South Georgia (and two species endemic to the island). The South Georgia Heritage Trust sponsored the restoration. Dickie also gave a talk on the planned eradication of mice on Gough Island. The mice eat Albatross chicks and other birds and have devastated avian populations. I won’t even link to the videos on YouTube which you can easily find if you are so inclined.
Dan Tompkins gave another great talk on making New Zealand predator free by 2050. This is a massive undertaking to eliminate alien predators (rats, opossums, and stoats) that kill all sorts of native wildlife including the kiwi.
In our work focused on terrestrial invasive plants (not growing on isolated islands) total eradication is nearly impossible. Nonetheless, these talks were inspiring. And, anyone who has been on a restored native prairie knows the beautiful sights, sounds, and smells of being in a native landscape. Perfection is not required!
My talk focused on precision herbicide applications using our Precision Electronic Dispenser. The key thing to remember about the Green Shoots® products is that they all reduce off-target harm from herbicides. Traditional high-pressure spray from backpacks inevitably causes off-target harm. Native plants are highly valuable, especially mature native perennials that may have been alive for as long as 30-40 years. You should do everything you can to preserve the health of those native plants when you are spot spraying nearby them!
Henry Grabar wrote an excellent piece in Slate on knotweed: “Oh, No, Not Knotweed! What I think is so important about this article is that it lays out the environmental consequences of knotweed – not just the potential for property value losses that are so widely reported about in the United Kingdom. Knotweed is especially devastating to waterways. The article notes the three key problems with knotweed identified by Chad Hammer at the University of New Hampshire:
- In a knotweed stand, virtually no light hits the ground. This prevents other plants and bugs, etc., from living in that patch.
- New trees cannot grow in a knotweed patch. This reduces woody debris, for example, in the stream.
- Erosion! Patches of knotweed have very little organic matter on the ground and the ground can erode easily.
Especially with flood events becoming more common – and water washing live, viable knotweed debris downstream – the problem will only get worse.
Knotweed can be controlled! The above photos show that an aggressive treatment can virtually eliminate it. The key is to keep after the straggler plants that will inevitably persist after the initial treatments. Here is our YouTube video: How to Kill Knotweed: 3 Simple Steps for the Non-Professional.
This is an impressive 2018 study on treating Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) with herbicide: Enloe et al., The Influence of Treatment Timing and Shrub Size on Chinese Privet (Ligustrum sinense) Control with Cut Stump Herbicide Treatments in the Southeastern United States. Note also that the study has good advice for treating many different kinds of woody invasives that are prone to lateral sprouting – tree of heaven being another prominent one. Here’s specifically what I like about the research they conducted.
First, the researchers used good technique for doing cut stump treatments. They cut the stump low to the ground – about 1 inch above ground level. Anecdotally, I have found that cutting the stump low to the ground makes a difference in the success of the treatment.
The researchers applied the herbicide immediately after making the cut – within 30 seconds. It is not known how quickly woody plants seal off wounds to live tissue; however, research does indicate that plants can react to physical wounds very quickly – within minutes. Why take a chance? Treat quickly after making the cut.
Second, the investigators did good follow-up. They didn’t just look at whether the stumps had re-sprouts. They also looked at sprouting from lateral roots within a 30 cm radius. The researchers checked the stumps at 6, 12, and 18 months after treatment. Most of the treated privet stumps likely died within the first 6 months in this study. However, as the authors note, that is not necessarily the case with different species of invasive woodies.
Third, the study reached important conclusions that really provide guidance to those in the field. It found that November treatments were more effective than April ones – 95% vs 87% mortality. The study found that glyphosate outperformed triclopyr in the November treatments – 97% to 91% control. The authors note that this suggests that “glyphosate is more effective than triclopyr for controlling species prone to lateral root sprouting.”
Finally, the authors found that lower than labeled concentrations of herbicide were effective at controlling privet. This conclusion may not be applicable to all species, but it does suggest that you should be safe using the lowest rates recommended on the label for cut stump and cut stem treatments.
We launched our new website! Please take a look: Green Shoots.
Check out our newest video How to Kill Invasive English Ivy Vines: 3 Steps. If you like PowerPoint presentations better, here it is: PowerPoint How to Kill English Ivy Vines. We will be publishing another set of presentations on killing English ivy groundcover. For that we recommend a foliar or wipe application. English ivy can be a real problem in many parts of the world. It can climb tall native trees and eventually even kill native trees. As a groundcover, it also can out-compete natives. One thing: English ivy can be controlled in the winter when many native plants are dormant.
At Green Shoots, we sell concentrated weed killer and our foam herbicide dispenser systems help you
apply that weed killer precisely and with low drift. Concentrated weed killer or herbicide is not just more economical. It is also more effective.
Read this paper (link) from Bryan Young, currently a professor at Purdue about glyphosate rates. In it he says: “The most consistent application factor that can increase glyphosate efficacy is lower carrier volumes.” What does Professor Young mean by this? He means that by adding less carrier (i.e., water) and increasing the amount of glyphosate herbicide (i.e., increasing the herbicide concentration) in the spray solution, the herbicide is more effective. Moreover, this is the case even though an application may cover less of the target plant.
Take a look at the photos below and this video to see before and after images of weeds treated with low volume/high concentration applications: Video (link). As you will see in the foliar applications, very small amounts of herbicide are applied to very small areas of foliage (probably covering less than 10% of the green foliage). In spite of the small amount of coverage, the weeds were completely killed.